You Asked: Laser TV vs. UX, speaker break-in tips, and re-boxing tales
On today’s You Asked: Laser TV versus a huge mini-LED TV. What happens to the TVs after we test them? Breaking in TV speakers — is that a thing? And why are we so obsessed with TV picture quality?
Laser TV or Hisense 110 UX?
Anand writes that he’s finally building a dedicated media room in a new home. He was planning on going with an ultra short throw projector — aka a laser TV — until he saw my video about the Hisense 110 UX. He feels the UX is overpriced right now but is willing to wait a year if the price might drop to $5,000-$6,000.
Anand, I do not think the Hisense 110 UX TV will drop by more than 50% in just a year. I think next year’s version may come out as less expensive. This year’s version — if there are still any left — may drop by as much as 50%. But I suspect the TV won’t sell for less than $10,000 until it is gone.
If you want a screen larger than 100 inches, then I suggest you go with your original plan of getting an ultra short throw projector and ALR screen. That’s probably the smarter move all around. In your light-controlled mini-theater, that UST projector is going to be bright enough for a thrilling experience.
Getting it all back in the box
Pat Walsh writes: I was just watching the UX unboxing video and I was wondering: How do you guys box these things back up to return them? It’s impossible to put all of the wrapping back on. Does it get moved on to another reviewer in its slightly used state? If so, do only certain reviewers rate a pristine tester? Keep up the good work. I love my U8K, which your video helped me decide on.
Pat, you’re right: When we re-box these TVs to go back to the manufacturer, I can’t put the protective film back on. Sometimes the protective sheath or bag gets a little torn because that material isn’t that strong, plus the tape they use to keep it in place tends to rip. Although we do a great job re-boxing these TVs, they are clearly not factory-fresh when we send them back.
I know that manufacturers will often check over the TV before sending it out to the next reviewer. However, I have been the recipient of TVs that have been out to another reviewer — not every TV I get is factory-fresh, though most of them are — and, yes, you don’t get the protective film on those.
Most manufacturers are good about resetting the TVs, which is great because I am bad at resetting them before I pack them up for return. But sometimes a brand urgently wants to get the TV to another reviewer and leaves my place bound for the next person. So they see me logged into their TV. My apologies to fellow reviewers. To be fair, sometimes they play pranks on me by watching crazy content to mess up my recommended feeds. I guess I deserve that.
What happens to these TVs after they have been reviewed? That depends on the brand and the company’s policy. I’d like to think the TVs land in the hands of someone who can appreciate and enjoy them. I also know of at least one brand that sticks them in a warehouse. They just sit there doing nothing before eventually getting “recycled,” which is a shame and a waste of a great TV.
Some TVs get damaged during shipping that a brand wouldn’t want to put out into the public, which I understand.
Best way to break in speakers?
Steve writes: I just finished watching the unboxing video of the Hisense 110 UX, and you mentioned “breaking in the speakers.” While I’m not expecting anything amazing from my Bravia without at least a soundbar, I’m curious what steps I can take to get the most out of what I’ve got. Do you have a routine you carry out every time on new TVs, or does it vary depending on the make and model? Keep up the great work!
Thanks for the question, Steve, and it’s interesting you picked up on that. The notion of speaker break-in is a matter of some debate. Some believe that it provides no audible change to a speaker’s performance, but it has been scientifically proven that a speaker driver’s operation changes a little after several hours of use.
TV speaker break-in might even seem laughable to some because if there is a question about whether high-end tower speakers appreciably change after break-in, then the idea that a tiny TV speaker might sound different after break-in is dubious for sure.
I’ll tell you this: The more elaborate the speaker system in a TV, the more inclined I am to give it a break-in period. The primary reason is that I don’t want to leave any questions about whether the performance I witness is indicative of the performance a user might get after their TV has been used for a while.
There are speaker break-in videos on YouTube that are basically glorified pink noise, where all frequencies are being produced. Run that for several hours, and your TV speakers are likely to get as broken in as they can. I would not expect a dramatic shift in performance, though.
As a parting thought, I’ll just throw it out there that some folks believe breaking in the listener is more important than breaking in the speaker.
Perfect TV quality: Why are we obsessed?
Rick Hall writes: Why are we obsessed with perfect TV quality? When I go to the movies, I don’t see inky blacks, nor do I see amazing spectacular highlights like the YouTube demos. I see an amazingly huge picture combined with awesome sound quality, providing an A+ experience!
I love this question. It’s one of those things that makes you go hmmmm. It seems almost obvious once you’ve heard it out loud. However, very few people have thought about this.
I’ll answer your question with what is basically just my opinion. In several of my super-large-screen TV reviews, where the TV was not top-of-the-line (it was a more affordable model that happened to be super huge), I’ve pointed out that many folks are very happy with very good picture quality at a huge size and would take that nine times out of ten, versus excellent picture quality at a smaller size.
There is something amazing about the massive scale of a commercial movie theater screen and the sound — perhaps not as high fidelity as some home systems. It’s just bigger, louder, and more expansive due to the scale of the system.
I think there’s a lot of psychology at play here. We want the best experience possible, so instead of getting a massive 200-inch or larger screen, we go for the best picture quality available. We own our TVs for a long time, and we look at them almost every day. It’s easier to notice a TV’s weaknesses than to focus on what a projector is or isn’t doing in a theater, especially when we’re in and out in just a couple of hours — unless it’s a Martin Scorsese film, of course.
Finally, because we can get such great picture quality — with levels of awesomeness for us to purchase — we consider the return on investment we want.
I also think that just the smell of popcorn and the excitement of an entertainment destination makes us a little forgiving.
So, add all that up, and I think that helps explain why we’re so obsessed with getting the best TV picture quality we can. I’m super excited that this is how some humans are because it keeps me in a job that I love very, very much. Thank you guys — no really, I mean it.
Laser TV or Hisense 110 UX?
Anand writes that he’s finally building a dedicated media room in a new home. He was planning on going with an ultra short throw projector — aka a laser TV — until he saw my video about the Hisense 110 UX. He feels the UX is overpriced right now but is willing to wait a year if the price might drop to $5,000-$6,000.
Anand, I do not think the Hisense 110 UX TV will drop by more than 50% in just a year. I think next year’s version may come out as less expensive. This year’s version — if there are still any left — may drop by as much as 50%. But I suspect the TV won’t sell for less than $10,000 until it is gone.
If you want a screen larger than 100 inches, then I suggest you go with your original plan of getting an ultra short throw projector and ALR screen. That’s probably the smarter move all around. In your light-controlled mini-theater, that UST projector is going to be bright enough for a thrilling experience.
Getting it all back in the box
Pat Walsh writes: I was just watching the UX unboxing video and I was wondering: How do you guys box these things back up to return them? It’s impossible to put all of the wrapping back on. Does it get moved on to another reviewer in its slightly used state? If so, do only certain reviewers rate a pristine tester? Keep up the good work. I love my U8K, which your video helped me decide on.
Pat, you’re right: When we re-box these TVs to go back to the manufacturer, I can’t put the protective film back on. Sometimes the protective sheath or bag gets a little torn because that material isn’t that strong, plus the tape they use to keep it in place tends to rip. Although we do a great job re-boxing these TVs, they are clearly not factory-fresh when we send them back.
I know that manufacturers will often check over the TV before sending it out to the next reviewer. However, I have been the recipient of TVs that have been out to another reviewer — not every TV I get is factory-fresh, though most of them are — and, yes, you don’t get the protective film on those.
Most manufacturers are good about resetting the TVs, which is great because I am bad at resetting them before I pack them up for return. But sometimes a brand urgently wants to get the TV to another reviewer and leaves my place bound for the next person. So they see me logged into their TV. My apologies to fellow reviewers. To be fair, sometimes they play pranks on me by watching crazy content to mess up my recommended feeds. I guess I deserve that.
What happens to these TVs after they have been reviewed? That depends on the brand and the company’s policy. I’d like to think the TVs land in the hands of someone who can appreciate and enjoy them. I also know of at least one brand that sticks them in a warehouse. They just sit there doing nothing before eventually getting “recycled,” which is a shame and a waste of a great TV.
Some TVs get damaged during shipping that a brand wouldn’t want to put out into the public, which I understand.
Best way to break in speakers?
Steve writes: I just finished watching the unboxing video of the Hisense 110 UX, and you mentioned “breaking in the speakers.” While I’m not expecting anything amazing from my Bravia without at least a soundbar, I’m curious what steps I can take to get the most out of what I’ve got. Do you have a routine you carry out every time on new TVs, or does it vary depending on the make and model? Keep up the great work!
Thanks for the question, Steve, and it’s interesting you picked up on that. The notion of speaker break-in is a matter of some debate. Some believe that it provides no audible change to a speaker’s performance, but it has been scientifically proven that a speaker driver’s operation changes a little after several hours of use.
TV speaker break-in might even seem laughable to some because if there is a question about whether high-end tower speakers appreciably change after break-in, then the idea that a tiny TV speaker might sound different after break-in is dubious for sure.
I’ll tell you this: The more elaborate the speaker system in a TV, the more inclined I am to give it a break-in period. The primary reason is that I don’t want to leave any questions about whether the performance I witness is indicative of the performance a user might get after their TV has been used for a while.
There are speaker break-in videos on YouTube that are basically glorified pink noise, where all frequencies are being produced. Run that for several hours, and your TV speakers are likely to get as broken in as they can. I would not expect a dramatic shift in performance, though.
As a parting thought, I’ll just throw it out there that some folks believe breaking in the listener is more important than breaking in the speaker.
Perfect TV quality: Why are we obsessed?
Rick Hall writes: Why are we obsessed with perfect TV quality? When I go to the movies, I don’t see inky blacks, nor do I see amazing spectacular highlights like the YouTube demos. I see an amazingly huge picture combined with awesome sound quality, providing an A+ experience!
I love this question. It’s one of those things that makes you go hmmmm. It seems almost obvious once you’ve heard it out loud. However, very few people have thought about this.
I’ll answer your question with what is basically just my opinion. In several of my super-large-screen TV reviews, where the TV was not top-of-the-line (it was a more affordable model that happened to be super huge), I’ve pointed out that many folks are very happy with very good picture quality at a huge size and would take that nine times out of ten, versus excellent picture quality at a smaller size.
There is something amazing about the massive scale of a commercial movie theater screen and the sound — perhaps not as high fidelity as some home systems. It’s just bigger, louder, and more expansive due to the scale of the system.
I think there’s a lot of psychology at play here. We want the best experience possible, so instead of getting a massive 200-inch or larger screen, we go for the best picture quality available. We own our TVs for a long time, and we look at them almost every day. It’s easier to notice a TV’s weaknesses than to focus on what a projector is or isn’t doing in a theater, especially when we’re in and out in just a couple of hours — unless it’s a Martin Scorsese film, of course.
Finally, because we can get such great picture quality — with levels of awesomeness for us to purchase — we consider the return on investment we want.
I also think that just the smell of popcorn and the excitement of an entertainment destination makes us a little forgiving.
So, add all that up, and I think that helps explain why we’re so obsessed with getting the best TV picture quality we can. I’m super excited that this is how some humans are because it keeps me in a job that I love very, very much. Thank you guys — no really, I mean it.